Starting XI
1.3K
·
2.8K
·
about 9 years

Tyler wrote:
Watched KCU lose 6-1 today....well second half. Mar had Tom Jackson and Billy Scott but big result for them

and Andy Bevin and new signing Southern United's best Irishman, Eric Molloy, so 4 National League players and 1st team keeper, Phil Imray also played. May be within the rules but is playing 4 National League players in Capital 1 (3 levels below) against a team that needs 1 point from their last 4 games to win the league really in the spirit of the game?

Still, suppose it gives KCU the chance to clinch the title at home next weekend when they play Wainui

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years
First Team Squad
210
·
1.4K
·
about 17 years

Miramar will be throwing everything they can at this team last few rounds, with their CL side safe, their third team has already won Capital 2 and won't be able to be promoted unless their reserves also get promoted.

Would this also make them the only team in CF with three teams in the top 3 grades?

Starting XI
1.3K
·
2.8K
·
about 9 years

ChopperNZ wrote:

Miramar will be throwing everything they can at this team last few rounds, with their CL side safe, their third team has already won Capital 2 and won't be able to be promoted unless their reserves also get promoted.

Would this also make them the only team in CF with three teams in the top 3 grades?

No surprise that they won Cap 2 - that team finished 6th in Cap 1 last season but got relegated due to the rule that clubs can't have more than one team in the top 3 divisions (Cap Prem, 1 & 2) Miramar 2nds finished 3rd bottom in Cap prem but as Petone got relegated and Waterside lost the playoff it meant 3 teams got relegated

They would be the only club to have teams in the top 3 grades

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
over 17 years

ChopperNZ wrote:

Miramar will be throwing everything they can at this team last few rounds, with their CL side safe, their third team has already won Capital 2 and won't be able to be promoted unless their reserves also get promoted.

Would this also make them the only team in CF with three teams in the top 3 grades?

No surprise that they won Cap 2 - that team finished 6th in Cap 1 last season but got relegated due to the rule that clubs can't have more than one team in the top 3 divisions (Cap Prem, 1 & 2) Miramar 2nds finished 3rd bottom in Cap prem but as Petone got relegated and Waterside lost the playoff it meant 3 teams got relegated

They would be the only club to have teams in the top 3 grades

hard to know which team is which most weekends

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

Feverish wrote:

ChopperNZ wrote:

Miramar will be throwing everything they can at this team last few rounds, with their CL side safe, their third team has already won Capital 2 and won't be able to be promoted unless their reserves also get promoted.

Would this also make them the only team in CF with three teams in the top 3 grades?

No surprise that they won Cap 2 - that team finished 6th in Cap 1 last season but got relegated due to the rule that clubs can't have more than one team in the top 3 divisions (Cap Prem, 1 & 2) Miramar 2nds finished 3rd bottom in Cap prem but as Petone got relegated and Waterside lost the playoff it meant 3 teams got relegated

They would be the only club to have teams in the top 3 grades

hard to know which team is which most weekends

 

Starting XI
1.3K
·
2.8K
·
about 9 years

I thought I'd get to see the first trophy of the season awarded on Sunday but Miramar spoiled KCU's potential party winning 6-1

here is my write up about it

and some photos

Trialist
0
·
81
·
about 16 years

Miramar 15 nil over stokes valley today. Superb well done guys 

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
over 13 years

ChopperNZ wrote:

Miramar will be throwing everything they can at this team last few rounds, with their CL side safe, their third team has already won Capital 2 and won't be able to be promoted unless their reserves also get promoted.

Would this also make them the only team in CF with three teams in the top 3 grades?

No surprise that they won Cap 2 - that team finished 6th in Cap 1 last season but got relegated due to the rule that clubs can't have more than one team in the top 3 divisions (Cap Prem, 1 & 2) Miramar 2nds finished 3rd bottom in Cap prem but as Petone got relegated and Waterside lost the playoff it meant 3 teams got relegated

They would be the only club to have teams in the top 3 grades

Genuine question. Isn't Central league considered the top division for a Wellington based club?

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
over 17 years

Global Game wrote:

ChopperNZ wrote:

Miramar will be throwing everything they can at this team last few rounds, with their CL side safe, their third team has already won Capital 2 and won't be able to be promoted unless their reserves also get promoted.

Would this also make them the only team in CF with three teams in the top 3 grades?

No surprise that they won Cap 2 - that team finished 6th in Cap 1 last season but got relegated due to the rule that clubs can't have more than one team in the top 3 divisions (Cap Prem, 1 & 2) Miramar 2nds finished 3rd bottom in Cap prem but as Petone got relegated and Waterside lost the playoff it meant 3 teams got relegated

They would be the only club to have teams in the top 3 grades

Genuine question. Isn't Central league considered the top division for a Wellington based club?

CL is a separate league with separate regs and separate ruling body to CF comps. Surely you know this?

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
over 13 years

Feverish wrote:

Global Game wrote:

ChopperNZ wrote:

Miramar will be throwing everything they can at this team last few rounds, with their CL side safe, their third team has already won Capital 2 and won't be able to be promoted unless their reserves also get promoted.

Would this also make them the only team in CF with three teams in the top 3 grades?

No surprise that they won Cap 2 - that team finished 6th in Cap 1 last season but got relegated due to the rule that clubs can't have more than one team in the top 3 divisions (Cap Prem, 1 & 2) Miramar 2nds finished 3rd bottom in Cap prem but as Petone got relegated and Waterside lost the playoff it meant 3 teams got relegated

They would be the only club to have teams in the top 3 grades

Genuine question. Isn't Central league considered the top division for a Wellington based club?

CL is a separate league with separate regs and separate ruling body to CF comps. Surely you know this?

I was stupidly ignorant actually, but thanks. The last time I lived in Wellington was in the mid 90s and I wasn't involved in football at the time. I hadn't considered the nature of CL being a two fed (4/5) competition; unlike fed 6 mainland which covers chch and top of the south. 

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
over 17 years

Oranje wrote:

Miramar 15 nil over stokes valley today. Superb well done guys 

hmmm

First Team Squad
210
·
1.4K
·
about 17 years

Definitely the largest score-line I can remember in Cap 1 in the last decade or so.

Feel a bit sorry for Stokes Valley, even though the result favours a couple of teams I support. Pretty farcical really. Maybe a rule needs to be introduced next year where National League players can't play for a team below Champs Prem unless it's their clubs 1st team...

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

Tight Battles may explain

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

ChopperNZ wrote:

Definitely the largest score-line I can remember in Cap 1 in the last decade or so.

Feel a bit sorry for Stokes Valley, even though the result favours a couple of teams I support. Pretty farcical really. Maybe a rule needs to be introduced next year where National League players can't play for a team below Champs Prem unless it's their clubs 1st team...

They play 1 CL game they are no longer National league players
WeeNix
200
·
950
·
over 14 years

Blew.2 wrote:

ChopperNZ wrote:

Definitely the largest score-line I can remember in Cap 1 in the last decade or so.

Feel a bit sorry for Stokes Valley, even though the result favours a couple of teams I support. Pretty farcical really. Maybe a rule needs to be introduced next year where National League players can't play for a team below Champs Prem unless it's their clubs 1st team...

They play 1 CL game they are no longer National league players

fairly easy to make it 'players who played for a national league team during the preceeding season"

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

inafoxhole wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

ChopperNZ wrote:

Definitely the largest score-line I can remember in Cap 1 in the last decade or so.

Feel a bit sorry for Stokes Valley, even though the result favours a couple of teams I support. Pretty farcical really. Maybe a rule needs to be introduced next year where National League players can't play for a team below Champs Prem unless it's their clubs 1st team...

They play 1 CL game they are no longer National league players

fairly easy to make it 'players who played for a national league team during the preceeding season"

Then you need more than a 30 day stand down for a Pro to drop to Nationail leage or C/L
Marquee
3.3K
·
5.1K
·
about 13 years

teams unhappy but Miramar haven’t broken any rules. Sounds like new rules will be put in place next year though. https://i.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/sport/95467023...

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

Yakcall wrote:

teams unhappy but Miramar haven’t broken any rules. Sounds like new rules will be put in place next year though. https://i.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/sport/95467023...

If at Cap Fusball take this seriously you have to look at Pro stand down period and also NL player to any club team  regardless of grade Nationally - NZFutsult would need to be the Tyrant to change NZ club football 
Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
over 17 years

Blew.2 wrote:

Yakcall wrote:

teams unhappy but Miramar haven’t broken any rules. Sounds like new rules will be put in place next year though. https://i.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/sport/95467023...

If at Cap Fusball take this seriously you have to look at Pro stand down period and also NL player to any club team  regardless of grade Nationally - NZFutsult would need to be the Tyrant to change NZ club football 

On the beersies early?

Starting XI
2.7K
·
2.5K
·
over 8 years

Big effort from Tawa holding Team Wellington to 3-0. Not a bad result for them. Uni especially, but the rest of the league as well have every right to be pissed off that Miramar are exploiting a loophole against the spirit of the rules.

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

Nelfoos wrote:

Big effort from Tawa holding Team Wellington to 3-0. Not a bad result for them. Uni especially, but the rest of the league as well have every right to be pissed off that Miramar are exploiting a loophole against the spirit of the rules.

No loophole - straight forward regrade rule. 
Marquee
1.2K
·
8.2K
·
almost 17 years

Rule 6.10 prevents someone who's played 75 per cent of a team's matches to re-grade, but due to Team Wellington players like Jackson only recently returning from a break, they were 'ungraded'.

"What Miramar have done may be morally questionable, and probably not the intent of the rule, but it's not illegal," Reid said.

Sounds like textbook loophole exploitation to me.

Trialist
5
·
62
·
almost 9 years

rumour has it that stop out drop 2 national league players the week beforehand to play against Miramar reserves. No one seems to have mentioned that?

Starting XI
2.7K
·
2.5K
·
over 8 years

Blew.2 wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Big effort from Tawa holding Team Wellington to 3-0. Not a bad result for them. Uni especially, but the rest of the league as well have every right to be pissed off that Miramar are exploiting a loophole against the spirit of the rules.

No loophole - straight forward regrade rule. 

Its a gap in the rules. Given they're changing it to prevent this I think its pretty safe to say its a loophole.

Semantics aside, its against what the rules intended and is just a general dick move.

Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
It's been happening for years. Meh
Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

Rumour  - unconfirmed - stokes Valley have appealed ineligible players and have been succesful. Apparently someone not registered so the 15 nil result will be a 3 nil.win to SV

Starting XI
510
·
2.1K
·
about 15 years

sthn.jeff wrote:

Rumour  - unconfirmed - stokes Valley have appealed ineligible players and have been succesful. Apparently someone not registered so the 15 nil result will be a 3 nil.win to SV

Hope this is the case just for the lolz!  The classic 18 goal & 6 point reversal!

Starting XI
2.7K
·
2.5K
·
over 8 years

TopLeft07 wrote:
It's been happening for years. Meh

Possibly the worst reason ever to keep doing something

Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
Did I say keep doing it? Just not sure why everyone is being so hard on Miramar when lots of clubs have been doing it for years. In any case people will do whatever it takes to be successful if it's within the rules. The reaction is a bit tall poppy.
Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
over 17 years

sthn.jeff wrote:

Rumour  - unconfirmed - stokes Valley have appealed ineligible players and have been succesful. Apparently someone not registered so the 15 nil result will be a 3 nil.win to SV

Untrue 

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

Feverish wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Rumour  - unconfirmed - stokes Valley have appealed ineligible players and have been succesful. Apparently someone not registered so the 15 nil result will be a 3 nil.win to SV

Untrue 

as I say it is not confirmed.  Just heard it from someone connected to SV
WeeNix
540
·
810
·
over 10 years

Here we go again, call in the lawyers

Split Personalities
57
·
520
·
over 10 years

11 teams again???

please not

rules are there to be pushed and miramar are good at it and know what's legal and what's not.

This is why the special 11 team ruling was so stupid as we all knew miramar knew they were breaking the rules and NW was just a sore loser/relegated

They had complained at the start of the season of team fixing at miramar at the start of the season so miramar played the joker on the last game of the season to help BNU move above NW and out of relegation  to pay NW back i am sure.

Then capital football became a joke by making a special rule to allowing NW (poor losers) to stay in the league that the NZ football ruling   relegated them from.

Lawyers won't help the game…..or stop Miramar pushing the rules.

Marquee
1.2K
·
8.2K
·
almost 17 years

rules are there to be pushed 

Is that true?
Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

11 teams again???

please not

rules are there to be pushed and miramar are good at it and know what's legal and what's not.

This is why the special 11 team ruling was so stupid as we all knew miramar knew they were breaking the rules and NW was just a sore loser/relegated

They had complained at the start of the season of team fixing at miramar at the start of the season so miramar played the joker on the last game of the season to help BNU move above NW and out of relegation  to pay NW back i am sure.

Then capital football became a joke by making a special rule to allowing NW (poor losers) to stay in the league that the NZ football ruling   relegated them from.

Lawyers won't help the game…..or stop Miramar pushing the rules.

Load of tripe 
Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

Oska wrote:

rules are there to be pushed 

Is that true?

The Turei Effect.  
First Team Squad
210
·
1.4K
·
about 17 years

As morally questionable as it is, I challenge anyone here to say that their club wouldn't have done the same thing in the same situation if those resources were available to them.

As it stands Miramar were in a position where they weren't challenging for CL, weren't on a cup run and risked the possibility of missing out on promotion for not one but two teams.

They've definitely gone overboard with the use of their top players but at the least it's going to mean that CF will look at the regrading rules and hopefully come up with something that is a bit more well balanced and fair.

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

Everyone is hung up on this National League Player thing but they all have been Miramar players since about May.  

First Team Squad
210
·
1.4K
·
about 17 years

Yeah fair point, edited my post to suit...

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up